
|
There are an awful lot of ministers who are limited in what they preach.
Whether it is because of doctrinal position, or personal conviction, or lack
of knowledge, or even fear, they are only teaching part of the Word of God.
If one were to receive their spiritual feeding from one of these ministers,
they would have an inadequate diet, because they would not be being fed the
fullness of God's counsel.
To be healthy, victorious, believers, we need to apply the counsel of God's
Word to each and every area of our lives. Any area where we are not applying
it is subject to spiritual illness, attacks, and defeat. But, if we are not
receiving the fullness of God's instruction, how will we know how to apply
it.
Paul, probably the greatest teacher in New Testament times, wrote on just
about every area of life, from marriage, to business, to child raising, to
our spiritual growth, to morals, to evangelism, to finances, to holiness.
And that's just one teacher. The rest of the Bible supports and confirms
what Paul said.
Speaking of his own ministry, Paul said:
Therefore I testify to you this day that I am innocent of the blood of
all men. 27 For I have not shunned to declare to you the whole
counsel of God
Acts 20:26-27 NKJV
Praise the Lord that Paul was innocent. It is obvious from this verse that
Paul understood that his responsibility as a minister included teaching and
preaching the whole gambit of what's written in the Bible. But, why did he
think that he could be guilty?
There is an obvious implication in this verse that the opposite is also true.
That is, any minister who doesn't teach the whole of the counsel of God,
leaving out a part he isn't comfortable with, is guilty of the blood of those
he has ministered to. Paul was concerned enough with this possibility that
he made it part of his final statement to the elders of Ephesus.
But, what about those who don't do as Paul did? What about, for example,
a pastor who doesn't teach on the necessity of tithing and giving offerings,
because he's afraid of losing his people. Or, how about a pastor who's being
controlled by a member of the board, who doesn't want him to preach about
helping the poor? Or even, how about someone who doesn't teach something
from ignorance, not knowing what the Bible says about it? Finally, what about
those whose doctrinal position is in contrary to God's opinion on a subject?
Are they guilty?
Looking at what Paul said, I'd have to say "yes, they are guilty." Somehow,
or other, they will have to answer to God about what they haven't done. God
will ask them why they didn't teach those subjects, and they will have to
answer Him.
I don't know about you, but I'd hate to have to answer those types of questions;
especially knowing that whatever answer I could give would be wrong. I don't
think God would be interested in my excuses, He'd just point to what He said
in His Word.
This calling we share, of being God's ministers, carries a great responsibility.
The responsibility of seeking God's will, His counsel, and His direction,
and then implementing what He has told us to do. Not what an organization
has told us, not what a board of directors has told us, only what God the
Father, speaking through His Holy Spirit has said.
Anything less than full obedience to God and preaching His full council carries
a heavy price. The price of being guilty of someone's blood. That's too great
a price for anyone to bear. God the Father had to send His Son, Jesus to
bear that price for us, since we couldn't bear it for ourselves. We dare
not put ourselves in the place of taking that responsibility.
So, are you guilty for the blood of anyone? |














|